ZibaldiSign in

writing amplification for novelists

Most unfinished novels didn't die at the desk.

They died in the eight months of bookkeeping around it. Zibaldi takes that part — the research, the continuity, the plotting, the remembering.

The writing stays where it belongs.

BetaFree to use while we're testing — the whole workspace, no card, no trial clock. We'll email you before that ever changes.

contents

01the problem

Andrew Hunter Murray has written three novels. Ask him about plotting and he calls it an absolute pig — the job he likes least and spends the most time on. Ask about drafting and it is the treat at the end.

Every working novelist has a version of that split. His pig is the timeline you rebuild in a spreadsheet. The eye colour you go hunting through chapter four for. The thirty thousand words of worldbuilding you were right to throw away. The character you introduced twice. The promise you planted in chapter two and never paid off.

It is most of the hours. The treat — the actual sentences, the jokes that only ever arrive while drafting — gets whatever is left. Usually nothing.

That is where books get abandoned. Not at the desk, but three months from it, buried in your own admin.

02the name

cat. no. 02 · italian, 14th c.

zibaldone n.

A hodgepodge; a heap of things. The cheap, disorderly notebook a writer kept for whatever turned up — overheard lines, quotations, prices, drafts, jokes, half-ideas with nowhere to go yet.

Boccaccio kept one. Leopardi's ran past four thousand pages before any of it became a book.

Nobody showed theirs to anyone. That was the point — a place with no standards, so the finished work could have them.

That is the Zibaldone, and it is the first thing you get here. Everything after it — the grid, the ledger, the audits — is the same instinct carried forward: catch everything, judge later, never make the writer be the filing system.

03the obvious fix, and why it isn't one

Type a premise, get a chapter. It demos beautifully.

Then you live with it. The voice thins out by chapter fifteen. Every character starts to sound like the same helpful narrator. Your afternoon goes on editing prose you did not write and do not much like. Meanwhile the bookkeeping is exactly where you left it — the story bible is still a wiki you update by hand.

And then the costs nobody mentions in the demo:

  • Text you didn't write isn't yours to register.
  • Amazon wants it declared.
  • Your publisher may want a warranty it isn't in there.
  • Three of four authors who use AI won't admit it to their peers.

That is a remarkable amount of exposure to take on in exchange for the one part of the job you actually wanted.

04the inversion

  1. 01

    You stop being your book's database.

    Eighty thousand words, forty scenes, who knew what and when. Somewhere in there a brother gets referenced eleven chapters before the letter that introduces him. The AI reads the manuscript and keeps the ledger — you get asked to confirm a fact, never to remember one.

  2. 02

    The question that would have cost you chapter thirty arrives in chapter three.

    Can you say the premise in one sentence, with concrete nouns? Does this scene do two things? Would the tale be poorer without this character? These land while they are still cheap to answer.

  3. 03

    The research gets done, then stays out of the prose.

    Findings save as cards, filed by theme, linked to the scenes that need them — never dropped into your paragraphs. Deep research, invisible on the page.

  4. 04

    The plot stops being a spreadsheet you maintain at night.

    A scene grid tracking the external beat and the internal one in parallel, auditing itself: which scene neither reveals nor develops, who has not had their moment, where the middle sags. It tells you before a reader does.

  5. 05

    And when you sit down to draft, it goes quiet.

    Not “it won’t unless you ask.” The default dial position cannot emit prose, and you can see that it is inert. The sentences are the whole reason you are here.

05whose advice is it

Every question, template and nudge is drawn from a corpus of 307 recorded conversations with working writers.

Two hundred and thirty findings filed so far, each carrying the source it came from. When the app suggests you pose a question and delay the answer, it also tells you that is Lee Child, and shows you where he said it. Twelve of the pros' methods ship as templates you can fill in.

There are as many ways to write as ways to live.
David Perell, after forty-plus interviews

Which is the design law here. Discovery writers get no outline anywhere and an open-questions board. Planners get a design space that can mature for months. Nothing is locked, nothing is the right way, and you can rearrange your own path whenever you like.

06how it actually goes

  1. 01

    An idea turns up somewhere inconvenient

    A train platform, usually. It goes into the Zibaldone — thumbs or voice, no title, no filing, no judgment. Eighteen months later you search one word and it is still there.

  2. 02

    You get it down to one sentence

    The premise workbench wants concrete nouns. Then the Librarian pulls the thread: if that is true, what happens to the tides, the light, the people with their fingers on the button?

  3. 03

    The reading happens

    You ask, it researches, findings arrive as sourced cards filed by theme. Note cards, without the shoebox and the decades.

  4. 04

    The grid fills in

    Each scene gets a day, a point of view, who is in the room, what we learn — and, in its own column, where the character is in himself.

  5. 05

    You draft

    Three modes, a sprint timer, a re-entry note from yesterday's stopping place. Local-first, so it works with the wifi off and saves instantly. Nothing writes back at you.

  6. 06

    You read it like a stranger

    Parked alternate endings, a polarity mirror, and a continuity audit that files plot holes as specific action items rather than a paragraph of vibes.

07the things you were going to ask

Will my manuscript train a model?
No — contractually, passed through from the API terms. Not a promise buried in a policy page.
Could generated prose end up in my book?
Not in the default mode, which cannot produce insertable prose at all. That keeps your book inside the Authors Guild's Human Authored line and on the side of Amazon's rules needing no disclosure — and keeps every word registrable, because you wrote it.
What if someone accuses me of using AI anyway?
You have receipts. Version history is authorship provenance: the whole evolution of the draft, exportable, alongside a ledger of every AI touch.
Will anyone find out I use this?
There is nothing to find. No badges, no watermark, no public feed, no leaderboard.
Am I being measured against other writers?
Never. This is not the cake — you do not compare flour and eggs to someone else's finished cake. Progress here is measured against your own earlier drafts and nothing else.

08against the alternatives

Written straight, because you can check all of it yourself.

Instead ofGood atLeaves you holding
NothingWord + a notebookFree, private, unimpeachable. Plenty of finished novels end here.You are the database. By month three you are re-reading chapter four to check an eye colour, and the timeline lives in your head or nowhere.
Scrivener, Plottrthe pro defaultThe best organization in the business, and nothing leaves your machine.Still no AI in 2026, by design — so the remembering, cross-checking and auditing all stay manual.
ChatGPT, Claudein another tabGenuinely good at one question at a time. Most novelists' AI use already happens here.It does not know what is in your book. Good at starting a novel, little help finishing one — you re-paste context forever and it still forgets chapter two.
Sudowrite, NovelCrafterthe AI fiction suitesReal tools with real craft in them, and story bibles that inject the right lore at the right moment.Pointed at producing prose — the half you wanted. The bible is yours to maintain by hand, and you pay in credit anxiety or configuration work.

If you are finishing books without any of this, you don't need us — genuinely, keep going. This is built for the writer with three abandoned manuscripts and a good reason for every one of them.

The AI reads, remembers, researches, and asks questions. You write.

That is the whole arrangement. It hasn't got a second clause.